Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 5 years ago,

User Stats

53
Posts
15
Votes
Deborah R.
Pro Member
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Tampa, FL
15
Votes |
53
Posts

Is it dangerous to buy a house that is 70 years old?

Deborah R.
Pro Member
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Tampa, FL
Posted

I am in my mid-30s and plan to continue to buy and hold for decades.  Right now we have a rental built in 1954 and another built in 2004.  Am I wrong to be wary of buying a house that is 70 years old?  Or do I just not understand construction?   Looking for my next purchase now, and most are built in the 1950s for the monthly rental price I'm shooting for.  Help me with my thought process.   TIA

Loading replies...