Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 12 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

26
Posts
20
Votes
Ryan F.
  • Investor
  • Redwood City, CA
20
Votes |
26
Posts

Investing into negative equity but below replacement cost

Ryan F.
  • Investor
  • Redwood City, CA
Posted

I'm looking to buy a cash flow SFH in the Atlanta area with 8% CAP rate and 10% CoC return. However, the appraised value is only 80% of purchase price ($100K) so I'll have to kick in $15K extra cash to close with a traditional loan. The price is ~ $20K below replacement cost, but does this make it a good investment?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

22,059
Posts
14,128
Votes
Jon Holdman
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Mercer Island, WA
14,128
Votes |
22,059
Posts
Jon Holdman
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Mercer Island, WA
ModeratorReplied

Why would you EVER buy for more than market price? I want to buy below market price, not above. If I have to sell, 10% would get eaten by the transaction costs, so I want to buy at least 10% below market price.

Paying $100K for $1100 in rent isn't a great deal. Combine that with the house being worth only $80K and I'm asking why you're even considering this.

Replacement cost is an irrelevant metric. Its useful for insurance. Even then, folks will argue you're over-insuring if you're insuring for replacement cost. Insure for what its worth. If it burns, take the settlement and sell the lot and buy a different house.

If you're working with someone who's trying to convince you this is a good deal based on the replacement costs, you need to find different people to work with.

Loading replies...