Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 12 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

26
Posts
20
Votes
Ryan F.
  • Investor
  • Redwood City, CA
20
Votes |
26
Posts

Investing into negative equity but below replacement cost

Ryan F.
  • Investor
  • Redwood City, CA
Posted

I'm looking to buy a cash flow SFH in the Atlanta area with 8% CAP rate and 10% CoC return. However, the appraised value is only 80% of purchase price ($100K) so I'll have to kick in $15K extra cash to close with a traditional loan. The price is ~ $20K below replacement cost, but does this make it a good investment?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

22,059
Posts
14,127
Votes
Jon Holdman
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Mercer Island, WA
14,127
Votes |
22,059
Posts
Jon Holdman
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Mercer Island, WA
ModeratorReplied

Why would you EVER buy for more than market price? I want to buy below market price, not above. If I have to sell, 10% would get eaten by the transaction costs, so I want to buy at least 10% below market price.

Paying $100K for $1100 in rent isn't a great deal. Combine that with the house being worth only $80K and I'm asking why you're even considering this.

Replacement cost is an irrelevant metric. Its useful for insurance. Even then, folks will argue you're over-insuring if you're insuring for replacement cost. Insure for what its worth. If it burns, take the settlement and sell the lot and buy a different house.

If you're working with someone who's trying to convince you this is a good deal based on the replacement costs, you need to find different people to work with.

Loading replies...