Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 5 years ago,

User Stats

24
Posts
11
Votes
Annalisa Brown
  • Virtual Assistant
  • Port Angeles, WA
11
Votes |
24
Posts

Tenant occupying home on second-home. First home in WASHINGTON!

Annalisa Brown
  • Virtual Assistant
  • Port Angeles, WA
Posted

Hello BP community! 

My husband and I are FINALLY purchasing our first home! It's a single family home in Washington state, and we are in California. It's scheduled to close on 1/28/2020, and we are using a second-home conventional loan because we do not qualify for primary (we're employed in CA and will not be in the home within 60 days of closing, more like 100) and we don't have the capital to put down on an investment loan (we want that extra cash we have saved for the BRRRR, AND need proof of 6 months of payment saved up anyways).

It's an FSBO property and I've been in close contact with the seller for months now, she owns multiple properties in the area and I'd like to say we have a good business relationship at this point... But I'm aware that we're new at this and naive, so I'm being careful, too. She's a lawyer.

Here is the sticky situation:

There are tenants in the home, they've been there for 7 years and knew it was up for sale. We were hoping to be able to have them stay through April, being that we'd get to the area the beginning of May.... It could help us pay the mortgage and give them time to find a new home. They are on a month to month lease with the seller and it sounds rather informal. However, when the appraiser went to look at the home, she found out that there were tenants in there and now the underwriter wants them out BY CLOSING! We can't legally have any renters in there, the seller is thinking about doing a rent-back or lease-back but I don't quite understand it or know if it will work. 

Any advice??? Should we just give them the 30 day notice and extend escrow? Can we have them front 3 months rent to us so that they technically aren't "renters" after we close? Caaannnnn.... We do a lease back, and would that benefit the buyer or the seller more? HELP! I don't want to be fraudulent and I also don't want to make someone move ASAP.... But I also don't want a problem with inherited tenants after closing. My emotions tell me to let them stay but reason is what I need to work out here instead. 

Loading replies...