Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

16
Posts
4
Votes
David Rodick
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Kansas City
4
Votes |
16
Posts

Ethics of House Hacking Acquisitions

David Rodick
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Kansas City
Posted

TLDR: The specific action of forcing a family with school-aged children to move with a month's notice during a school year, for no other reason than I prefer to move in, seems like a line that shouldn't be crossed.

I am a new investor seeking my first property. My goal is to house-hack a duplex. (I am also required to owner-occupy as I intend to use a VA loan.)

I'm frequently running into the problem of both units being occupied and a scarcity of duplexes with one side vacant. This occupancy is certainly a good sign, but would require that I terminate the lease of one of the current occupants (who are often on a month-to-month lease). This often raises an ethical question to my mind.

Terminating leases doesn't bother me in and of itself, as a business needs to be run as a business, and there are no breaches of legal contract as long as I give the notice required by their lease. I certainly have no problem swiftly evicting non-payers. My moral question comes from terminating a lease, for no other reason than I prefer to move in, when children are involved when it is the middle of the school year.

As a teacher in a low-income school, I almost weekly observe the enormous challenges students face whenever they have to change schools or districts, which for too many students, happens frequently. All of this is enormously stressful on a student, they have a hard time catching up with their new school's curriculum in the middle of a semester/year, they struggle to form relationships, and they often struggle with distrust, lack of motivation, even withdrawal. All of this leads to them struggling academically and reinforces cycles of poverty and being disadvantaged.

I have no illusions of fixing social cycles, using real estate as a charity, or being a savior, but I am keenly aware of the responsibility I have with the power of property acquisition. The specific action of forcing a family with school-aged children to move with a month's notice during a school year seems like a line that shouldn't be crossed.

I am eager for the perspectives of others on this issue. Is there something I'm not considering? Am I being too considerate (and if so, why)? Are there any alternatives I'm not thinking of? And please share any other thoughts or advice you think may be helpful. Thank you all in advance.


Loading replies...