Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 4 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

86
Posts
56
Votes
Craig E.
  • Real Estate Broker / General Contractor
  • Sacramento, CA
56
Votes |
86
Posts

Real Estate Brokerage ideas

Craig E.
  • Real Estate Broker / General Contractor
  • Sacramento, CA
Posted

I'm considering opening a RE brokerage.  I've notice that discount brokerages despite doing the same thing as full cost brokerages and for less money are not taking over the industry like Uber, ABB, Turo.  If paying less isn't the incentive, then what is?  What would be so unique in a RE brokerage that would make people overwhelming turn away from the old model to the new model in the same way as Uber, ABB, Turo?  I'm asking you all what you would need to see in a brand new company/ a new RE brokerage model that would make you or the public move away from using the old model brokerage in the same way these new companies caused immediate capitulation to their new models.  Thanks for your input.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

3,019
Posts
2,320
Votes
Will Fraser
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Salt Lake City & Oklahoma City
2,320
Votes |
3,019
Posts
Will Fraser
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Salt Lake City & Oklahoma City
Replied

Hi @Craig E.!  As a broker consider a similar move the things I have realized in RE is that people are so hung up with the social side to real estate that they frequently make decisions that are harmful to them.  For instance:  your cousin is an agent . . . Many, and perhaps most people would not think beyond that point itself.  Cousin Agent gets a call and off to work he goes, irrespective of cost and skill. 

For that reason I think that markets with high “non-native” numbers tend to value agents who know what they are doing OR are cheap and innovative more than markets who are more “native” occupied.  

For instance:  Little Rock, Arkansas vs Nashville, TN — LR’s populations (painting with broad strokes here) largely lives in Little Rock because they are from LR or from the region.  For that reason you can expect the residents to live in basic proximity to:

- Childhood friends

- HS friends

- HS teachers

- Nuclear family

- Extended family

- A litany of other people who have been in their lives for a long time who got their license and can make an easy buck or two helping their “friends” buy and sell RE.

As a contrast, a city like Nashville, TN has experienced rapid growth over the last 2 decades and has churned residents at a rate that creates an interesting dynamic now:  there are so many non-native Nashvillians in Nashville now that many people do not live around those old built-in social circles, which allows them to value 1. Cheap or 2. Good without the perpetual, low-grade fear of an awkward conversation over Thanksgiving.

So, if you’re in a market with a lot of churn and a high resident base that didn’t grow up there, you may well see that quality and price are far more important than in more “retentive” markets.

Loading replies...