Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 5 years ago,

Account Closed
  • Philadelphia
5
Votes |
13
Posts

Risk vs Reward less desirable area/more desirable

Account Closed
  • Philadelphia
Posted

Hey all, just seeing if anyone has any insight on the following. 

If looking to tie up the least amount of cash possible, would the risk outweigh the rewards if looking to purchase a low value home (80-95k), no major updates needed just minor cosmetics but not in the best area/ possibly sub par tenant prospects .  

Or would it be a better idea to just ponie up more cash and buy a property in a better area (150k) with better prospective tenants. Still only cosmetic needed.  

I'd be looking to just a buy and hold . Clearly the second option sounds better, however, since it would be my first purchase  I'd feel more comfortable starting with something much smaller in value and tying up less cash (20%down). Has anyone purchased both of these scenarios ( a lower value/ less attractive area and higher value/ better area). Would the pros outweigh the cons for either? 

Loading replies...