Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 12 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

2
Posts
0
Votes
Oakley Pack
  • Charlotte, NC
0
Votes |
2
Posts

Escalator clause on REO

Oakley Pack
  • Charlotte, NC
Posted

Hi everyone, I'm new at this but have found all of the discussions to be very insightful so I'm curious to hear your thoughts on my situation. I put in an offer on an REO home that has been on the market for more than 3 months for about 70% of asking price. I expected that it would be countered, and it was, with the seller countering at 97% of list. He also mentioned that there had been another offer for 82% of list. I countered at 86%, but the response was that now there is another bidder and we are to send the "highest and best offer". It seems like a strange thing to me, because if I actually paid my highest and best offer (which is I'd say maybe 95% of list), that's right at the point where it starts to not make financial sense anymore. I need to get it at something below my highest and best offer to want to do the deal. So I am forced to make a guess at some offer below 95% of list that balances out the gain in profits versus the lowered chance that I get the deal?

I feel like the easiest way out of this is submitting an offer that says something like "I am willing to offer 1% more than any other highest offer, up to a specified amount (95% of list price). Something like:

“In the event of a competing offer the buyers will pay 1% over the highest offer’s net up to a purchase price of $. In the event of an escalation, seller to provide proof of competing purchase contract with preapproval or proof of funds. Seller represents and warrants that competing offers are true and valid offers."

Does anyone have experience submitting an escalator clause like this to an REO? The owner is Freddie Mac in this case. Would this cause my offer to be completely disqualified for not following the rules? Or has this worked for people before to help get a good price without paying your true "highest and best"?

Thanks!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

17,995
Posts
17,195
Votes
J Scott
  • Investor
  • Sarasota, FL
17,195
Votes |
17,995
Posts
J Scott
  • Investor
  • Sarasota, FL
ModeratorReplied

I guess it's possible that a seller and listing agent would accept such a clause, but I think it's highly unlikely in an REO purchase. And it's very highly unlikely that any reputable listing agent will show you another buyer's offer for any reason.

Mostly likely, this will get your offer ignored, unless it's the best offer at your original price.

Loading replies...