Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago,

User Stats

7
Posts
0
Votes
Brice Craig
  • Professional
  • Charlottesville, VA
0
Votes |
7
Posts

Partnership Structure | 2 Duplexes

Brice Craig
  • Professional
  • Charlottesville, VA
Posted

Hello,

We're working on an interesting partnership structure involving (2) duplexes that are on the same property. It is likely that we will subdivide the property and split the (2) units into separate properties so we will each own (1) duplex. 

I am in charge of putting together a rough outline of what the partnership structure will be before we get a lawyer involved to make it official.  The other side of the deal has an interesting question. What if they want to move and sell the property down the road but don't want to put it on the open market?

Is there a good way to structure the deal so that the other side of the deal is required to purchase the property should the other owner want to sell? Would it be standard that the other side is able to purchase the property back at the original value or would it be for the estimated fair market value? I don't think it's fair to have to purchase the property back if the other side wanted to sell a year later and it had appreciated tremendously. 

Any thoughts or experiences would be great! Thanks!