Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 12 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

309
Posts
18
Votes
Edita D.
  • Investor
  • San Diego, CA
18
Votes |
309
Posts

condo purchase to rent out in 4 years. Is it worth it???

Edita D.
  • Investor
  • San Diego, CA
Posted

Hey guys,
to rent an apartment in my good neighborhood (right next to Balboa park, San Diego), costs:
-1bedrrom: 1000-1300$/month (average 1100)
-2bedroom: 1300-1950$/month (average 1600)
Data taken from www.rentometer.com

My fiance and I were thinking about PURCHASING a condo that we can stay in for 4 years, and then move into a house in a good neighborhood away from the city. (Houses per sq ft are almost 1.5-2 times more expensive in this Balboa neighborhood in comparison with condos). The plan was to RENT out this condo once we buy a house. This way we were trying to build EQUITY instead of building SOMEBODY ELSE'S equity.
But after analyzing the condo market, we figured out that once we move out of the condo and get it rented, our cash-flow will be 350-450$/month NEGATIVE!!!!!!! (Basically, it's 350-450$ more to OWN than to RENT). We looked at lots of different properties and played with numbers, and we STILL come out short, unless we find a condo that charges 35% less per sq ft and HOAs do not exceed 250! It's almost IMPOSSIBLE to find a deal like that.

I definitely do not want to be throwing money away, but doesn't it seem a lot more cost-effective to just RENT for 1-2 years, and then buy a house. In the meantime buy another property (as many as we can afford!) in Vegas, Phoenix or any other cash-flow cities. (we currently own a 4-plex in CA and a 2br house in Vegas). I really want to own, but I have to be LOGICAL. No emotions.
Besides, a 350000 condo will cost us (with the HOA fees) the same amount to spend a month as a 425000 house!!!.

What do you guys think?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

22,059
Posts
14,128
Votes
Jon Holdman
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Mercer Island, WA
14,128
Votes |
22,059
Posts
Jon Holdman
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Mercer Island, WA
ModeratorReplied

Don't get wrapped up in "throwing money away on rent". That's one of those myths propagated by those with an interest in you buying and selling real estate. Your alternative is to throw money away on interest on a loan. And the costs of ownership are higher than just the PITI and HOA. The costs of a rental are higher still because of vacancy and dealing with tenants. Especially in CA, which is tenant friendly. A professional tenant can stiff you for several months rent and leave behind a mess. In many cases, and I suspect this is one, renting is the cheaper alternative to buying.

Also consider the costs of buying and selling. When you sell in good times, you'll spend 8% or more on commissions and closing costs. In bad times (like now) another 3% for concessions to the seller. And its about 2% when you buy.

Investing in rentals is very different than buying a residence. The criteria are often very different . People who buy then have to rent are "reluctant landlords" that are very often in a losing position. Don't deliberately put yourself in this position.

IMHO you should only buy a property you intend to die in. If you're planning to move, especially in a short time like four years, the transaction costs will kill you (ha!)

Loading replies...