Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

114
Posts
73
Votes
Christopher Freeman
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Keene, NH
73
Votes |
114
Posts

Estoppel and Lost Leases

Christopher Freeman
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Keene, NH
Posted

Howdy BPers!

I recently came to terms on a 3 family property in New Hampshire, and have included the completion of estoppel certificates as a condition of the sale. Today I learned that the Landlord may not have copies of the lease. I suspect that the same may be true for some or all of the tenants.

My questions are:

1. If nobody can procure a written lease, can I compel the execution of a new lease under my terms by giving notice?

2. If neither party can procure a written lease, but certify that one exists in the TEC, does that bind me to the terms disclosed therein?

3. Can I add a provision to the TEC that requires the presentation of a written agreement in order for it to be binding and that, absent this proof, a month to month tenancy will be established at the disclosed rate?

I understand that the tenants in place have rights and that my preferences have no bearing on that. That said, to the greatest extent legally and ethically permissible, I would prefer not to be subject to term leases when I take possession. One of the tenants is appallingly filthy (think poop on the walls), and another smokes indoors. All rents are severely below market.

My goal here is to understand how much latitude I have during the stabilization process, and to ensure that I don't give up flexibility during the estoppel process.

Thanks,

Christopher M. Freeman | Co-Owner

Parabola, LLC | PO Box 282 | Keene, NH 03431

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

78
Posts
7
Votes
Lou Veiga
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Hollis, NH
7
Votes |
78
Posts
Lou Veiga
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Hollis, NH
Replied

Hi Christopher, ,

Interesting predicament.  It would seem to me that if nobody can procure a written lease then there's no way they can hold you to anything, since there's no proof.  Otherwise they could claim just about anything.  

I hope someone with knowledge of the laws can chime in with an answer to help you out.

Good Luck! 

Lou 

Loading replies...