Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

14
Posts
1
Votes
Sachin T.
1
Votes |
14
Posts

Negative cashflow strategy

Sachin T.
Posted

Is it wise to keep a negative cashflow home in the bay area for appreciation, if you can fund the negative cashflow from the positive cashflows generated from other properties. The advantage I see is the huge depreciation benefit that the property gives along with the actual negative cashflow (loss). Ideally I think it's good to have a mix of appreciation and cashflow in the portfolio, wanted to see what experts think. My strategy is to keep the property for next 7-10 years with negative cashflow but generate way more positive cashflow from other investments and also make tax free gains on the generated cashflow due to the huge depreciation benefit.

Loading replies...