Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 6 years ago,

User Stats

8
Posts
0
Votes
Kelly Nolan
0
Votes |
8
Posts

Temporary negative cash flow for long-term home? Please Advise!

Kelly Nolan
Posted

Would it make sense to buy a home, rent for 1-2 years (negative cash flow), with the intention of making it our primary residence thereafter? Please advice. Is there anything I need to think about here?

We found a home that we love in the bay area and is a good value (not for a short term investment, but as a family home. Ready to live in but with some simple cosmetic work, it will look amazing). However, we currently own our apartment and we're not in an urgent rush to move (but def can if it makes financial sense). Is it worth buying now given that interest rates are low and homes like this come around pretty rarely (i'm very familiar with the area). We have the money to buy exactly what we want now.

Here are some details: If and when we rent our current Apt at about $4500/month, we'll break even with our apt mortgage/all fees.

The home we like is in a steady growth market of 4-6% per year, but not in a high appreciation area (though who knows with all the IPOs this year in SF...but I don't want to speculate). Costs $1.55m. We'd put 20% down.  Our monthly mortgage (including insurance and all that jazz) would be $7500/month. We can rent for $6000/month. That's an 18k per year that we are paying + maintenance. We could move in immediately, but if we owned both, seems better to get the higher home rent than the apt.  Would this ever make sense to do? (I'm not so worried about tenants/evictions in this year, because it's all high-income families)

While we are ok with waiting 1-2 years to buy, we can probably find something else in our price range that we like but won't be as great of a value (most on the market are either turnkey or needs to be gutted completely, which we won't do).  Not sure what will happen to interest rates in the future and I expect a steady growth rate to be conservative, but of course, risk of that it could be higher. But not lower.

If we do wait 1-2 years, we're not planning to buy anything else in the meantime, because we will need to money for the down payment.

Loading replies...