Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 6 years ago,

User Stats

29
Posts
4
Votes
Kevin Danikowski
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Chicago (suburbs), IL
4
Votes |
29
Posts

How to Owner-finance part of this deal?

Kevin Danikowski
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Chicago (suburbs), IL
Posted

Hey All,

I have an owner that is very willing to do owner financing as long as I hit his purchase price (PP). He owns 150k equity in a 350k 3 unit property. I'm trying to figure out my best course of action to do 100% LTV because I'll need to put up 20k toward a new roof after the sale. Everything else in good condition.

Strategy 1:

Wrap around mortgage. He refinanced with a 4.75% 30 year loan 3 years ago and owes 200k on it. I would then have a mortgage where I pay him and he pays his loan. 

Strategy 2:

Find a bank that will take first position for 60% of PP, and seller takes second position for 40% of PP. 

Both of these have a due on sales clause risk, I'm not sure of the severity of that risk, but since there may be a market recession soon, is that risk magnified? I would believe it is the opposite since the bank doesn't want an upside down property? That's another thing in itself.