Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 6 years ago,

User Stats

16
Posts
5
Votes
Greg B.
  • Denver, CO
5
Votes |
16
Posts

Dowsides to this lease option strategy

Greg B.
  • Denver, CO
Posted

I have an interesting purchase strategy being presented to me, and I wanted to put it in front of the community here to help me poke holes in it. 

The situation:  I have a family member who wants to help me out in growing my portfolio.  When we first started talking, he was going to do a straight private financing loan to me for the purchase of a property.  After some discussions, we started coming up with a strategy to help him whittle down some carried forward capital losses.


So, instead of lending me the money to buy a property at 6% interest, (which he would have to pay income tax on) he would buy the property himself and lease it back to me.  I would pay him a flat annual leasing fee equivalent to 2% of the purchase price.  I would also purchase the property from him in 3 years at a 4% appreciation rate.  The 2% lease and 4% appreciation is equivalent to the 6% interest I would have paid, but he would be able to apply the 4% to his carried forward capital losses, because they would be considered capital gains when I buy the property.  I would then sub-lease the property to tenants and manage the property, retaining the rents minus expenses.

Advantages to me:  

  • greater cash flow now, as I would be free to rent out the property and keep all revenues (minus expenses and the 2% lease fee)
  • I can use the purchase in 3 years as the replacement property in a 1031 of another property, alleviating some of the concerns around finding replacements.

Advantages to him:  

  • less tax, and therefore better returns.

Here are the downsides that I can identify, and I'm looking for input on others:

  • I have to pay tax on the net income, as I would have no offsetting appreciation.  So, the tax he saves comes from my pocket.
  • If the market turns, I would be underwater when I purchase in 3 years because I'm locking in 4% appreciation.
  • Capital expenditures are a grey area.  If I have to put in a new furnace, do I own the furnace at a house he owns?  Can I depreciate that?
  • The big one:  would the IRS consider this tax evasion?  I have no interest in doing anything below board, and this has me concerned.

Thank you all for any help you can give in brainstorming disadvantages.

Loading replies...