Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

16
Posts
5
Votes
Greg B.
  • Denver, CO
5
Votes |
16
Posts

Dowsides to this lease option strategy

Greg B.
  • Denver, CO
Posted

I have an interesting purchase strategy being presented to me, and I wanted to put it in front of the community here to help me poke holes in it. 

The situation:  I have a family member who wants to help me out in growing my portfolio.  When we first started talking, he was going to do a straight private financing loan to me for the purchase of a property.  After some discussions, we started coming up with a strategy to help him whittle down some carried forward capital losses.


So, instead of lending me the money to buy a property at 6% interest, (which he would have to pay income tax on) he would buy the property himself and lease it back to me.  I would pay him a flat annual leasing fee equivalent to 2% of the purchase price.  I would also purchase the property from him in 3 years at a 4% appreciation rate.  The 2% lease and 4% appreciation is equivalent to the 6% interest I would have paid, but he would be able to apply the 4% to his carried forward capital losses, because they would be considered capital gains when I buy the property.  I would then sub-lease the property to tenants and manage the property, retaining the rents minus expenses.

Advantages to me:  

  • greater cash flow now, as I would be free to rent out the property and keep all revenues (minus expenses and the 2% lease fee)
  • I can use the purchase in 3 years as the replacement property in a 1031 of another property, alleviating some of the concerns around finding replacements.

Advantages to him:  

  • less tax, and therefore better returns.

Here are the downsides that I can identify, and I'm looking for input on others:

  • I have to pay tax on the net income, as I would have no offsetting appreciation.  So, the tax he saves comes from my pocket.
  • If the market turns, I would be underwater when I purchase in 3 years because I'm locking in 4% appreciation.
  • Capital expenditures are a grey area.  If I have to put in a new furnace, do I own the furnace at a house he owns?  Can I depreciate that?
  • The big one:  would the IRS consider this tax evasion?  I have no interest in doing anything below board, and this has me concerned.

Thank you all for any help you can give in brainstorming disadvantages.

Loading replies...