Buying & Selling Real Estate
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
![](http://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/assets/forums/sponsors/hospitable-deef083b895516ce26951b0ca48cf8f170861d742d4a4cb6cf5d19396b5eaac6.png)
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
![](http://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/assets/forums/sponsors/equity_trust-2bcce80d03411a9e99a3cbcf4201c034562e18a3fc6eecd3fd22ecd5350c3aa5.avif)
![](http://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/assets/forums/sponsors/equity_1031_exchange-96bbcda3f8ad2d724c0ac759709c7e295979badd52e428240d6eaad5c8eff385.avif)
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated over 13 years ago on . Most recent reply
Something not adding up
I have been investing in real estate since 2003. Ever since I can remember everyone always says California doesn't make much sense for rental properties. I have always agreed with this(that's why I flip)but right now in California I think buy and hold can rival any area.
Example being my last three flips.
These areas are not war zones but definitely lower income.
Triplex 105,000 - aquisition price rents for $2500
Single family 2/1 - 72,000 - aquistion price rents for $1250
Single family 3/1 - 95,000 - aquistion price rents for $1495
Obviously I sold these more than the aquistion price but still any good investor in any area will never pay retail
This seems to rival any area around the country. What am I missing here?
And plus these areas are within 45 minutes of the ocean and San Francisco. And not to far from Silicon Valley etc...