Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

6
Posts
3
Votes
Justin DeSantis
  • Specialist
  • Santa Clarita, CA
3
Votes |
6
Posts

Chatsworth, Ca Cash Flow Rental residential

Justin DeSantis
  • Specialist
  • Santa Clarita, CA
Posted

I have a Seller in Chatsworth, Ca that wants to sell for $700,000. I know typically we go by the 2% rule for cash flow but Southern California can't use this rule right? $14k monthly seems a little obnoxious even in So Cal. Does anyone have any insight into how much I can pay for this deal and still cash flow.

Ps. I have heard of people charging about 1k per room here in So Cal....

Any help would be much appreciated.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

73
Posts
70
Votes
David Fitch
  • Investor
  • Westlake Village, CA
70
Votes |
73
Posts
David Fitch
  • Investor
  • Westlake Village, CA
Replied

2% rule is not attainable anywhere in SoCal - it's hard to find even in the more well known "cash flow" happy investor cities. You'd be lucky to find a place that you could rent at 1% of purchase price in SoCal - even that would be near impossible unless you're looking at larger multi-family properties. Most realistic on SFH rentals is you may get a monthly rate of between 0.5% - 0.75% of purchase price.

As mentioned, whether or not you can have positive cash flow on a $700k purchase price depends on:

1) How much of that is financed (and by extension, what your monthly PITI payment amounts to).

2) How much your other total monthly costs are (10% for maintenance? 5% for vacancy allowance? 8% for a PM? Gardening, Utilities, etc.)

3) Add #1 and #2, and compare to how much you think you can rent it for. Rentometer is a good source, as mentioned.

If 1+2 > 3, then you are not cash flowing. If 1+2 < 3, then you are. 

Obviously the biggest lever you have to move that needle, is how much $$ you put down. The more you put down, the less your monthly out of pocket expense, the more likely you are to achieve positive cash flow. 

It's not clear why you zeroed in on this property specifically. Typically you want to start with an understanding of rent to purchase price ratios in a given area, and if you find a deal in that area with a favorable ratio compared to everything else, then you start a more detailed analysis of that specific property. It seems like here, you started with the property and are trying to reverse engineer what price you should pay based on how close you can get to some mythical rule. If that's what you're doing, I'd recommend taking a step back and looking at the broader area first, and then deciding if this specific property is a good deal or not. 

Loading replies...