Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 6 years ago on .

User Stats

2
Posts
1
Votes
Scott Smith
  • Investor
  • Austin, TX
1
Votes |
2
Posts

Seller Financing & Best Home Insurance Options for Buyer/Seller?

Scott Smith
  • Investor
  • Austin, TX
Posted

Looking for advice/suggestions from other seller financed note carriers.

Do you carry the home insurance yourself on the property you are selling (normally forced place coverage) or do you let the buyer carry the home insurance themselves? I know there are pros and cons to both.

The biggest cons I see to not covering it in the payments (escrowing it each month) is that if your property is free and clear and they stop paying or lapse the coverage that your investment is at risk.

However, if you cover the property with forced place insurance, your investment is covered no matter what. Also, in the case that something happened to the house (it burned down for example) the property would be covered and you would be given the check for repair costs.

The other side to you covering the insurance is that it is more of a catastrophic type of insurance and would not cover smaller things, like theft, etc.

What would that look like in this case? Would you just work something out with the buyer, rebuild, etc.

The other downside to having the buyer carry their own insurance is that you have to now monitor and be involved with when and if they pay, the notices that go along with this from the insurance company and the time you will be spending to monitor this multiplied by however many properties you own.

Thanks!