Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

24
Posts
7
Votes
Emmett O.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Philadelphia, PA
7
Votes |
24
Posts

Big Shop or Local Lender: Is it worth saving 40bps?

Emmett O.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Philadelphia, PA
Posted

Hi everyone,

I'm in the process of buying my first investment property and I have a conundrum. I thought I was all set up to use my mortgage broker that I used for my first house but when she got back to me the rate was much higher than I expected.

With that issue popping up I shopped around and got a lower rate from Quicken. The rate she gave me was 6%, the rate Quicken gave me was 5.625%.

My question is: is it worth saving 40bps just to get the cheaper loan? Or should I stick with the local lender? My preference is the local lender but I was wondering if anyone had any further wisdom or can relate to this story.

Thanks everyone for your help!

-Emmett

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

9,934
Posts
10,788
Votes
Chris Mason
  • Lender
  • California
10,788
Votes |
9,934
Posts
Chris Mason
  • Lender
  • California
ModeratorReplied
Originally posted by @Emmett O.:

Hi everyone,

I'm in the process of buying my first investment property and I have a conundrum. I thought I was all set up to use my mortgage broker that I used for my first house but when she got back to me the rate was much higher than I expected.

With that issue popping up I shopped around and got a lower rate from Quicken. The rate she gave me was 6%, the rate Quicken gave me was 5.625%.

My question is: is it worth saving 40bps just to get the cheaper loan? Or should I stick with the local lender? My preference is the local lender but I was wondering if anyone had any further wisdom or can relate to this story.

Thanks everyone for your help!

-Emmett

 I would suggest not taking an internet lender at face value until you see a Loan Estimate. No one puts investment property rates online because they would scare off the retail owner occupants, but look at how they market:

So if you just call their call center in Detroit and describe that scenario and ask "what's my rate?" they will come back with 4.5% (if the ad above is your scenario on that date) and you will go "OMG that's great!"

For those unaware, "2.125 points," that you have to scroll to the small print to find, is a fee equal to 2.125% of the loan amount. On a $500k mortgage, it works out to $10,625. If you want to pay an extra $10,625 in fees, call the other lender back, tell them you have $10k extra to blow, and ask what your rate is now. I suspect that you will like your answer. 

  • Chris Mason
  • Loading replies...