Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 6 years ago,

User Stats

284
Posts
137
Votes
Pat Jackson
Pro Member
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Reno, NV
137
Votes |
284
Posts

How would you analyze this commercial property?

Pat Jackson
Pro Member
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Reno, NV
Posted

I'll try to be brief.  I'm looking at an 8 unit apartment building above an autoparts store.  It's not ghetto, I swear.

My partner and I have the P&L statements for 2014-2018.  The apartment portion of this deal has been really under market.  This most recent year is the closest to actual market rents.  The expenses and vacancy have waxed and waned over this time period.  

To come up with the NOI, I feel the most accurate thing to do is take the 2018 rents, and the average expenses and vacancies for 2014-2018. Thoughts?

  • Pat Jackson
  • Loading replies...