Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

102
Posts
10
Votes
Jeremy Karja
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Elk River, MN
10
Votes |
102
Posts

How close can you buy to a bad area and avoid many problems?

Jeremy Karja
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Elk River, MN
Posted

Hi,

I know it depends on what you want to do but just wanted to get some opinions on how close you can be to the bad area and still attract high enough tenants that required little attention?   See pic below from Trulia as an example.  This house is on the edge of the troubled area.  Probably C range in my eyes property or maybe even C-

Basically I am very busy (like most) but with 5 young kids and a job I work pretty hard at but control my schedule I don't want high turnover and attention but also want enough income from the property for the cash flow to  be there.  Love to get 1.5 to 2% rule if I can with 15%++ cash on cash.  I know they are extremely hard to find these days.

Look forward to hearing some opinions here.

Jeremy

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

535
Posts
389
Votes
James Galla
  • Attorney
  • Akron, OH
389
Votes |
535
Posts
James Galla
  • Attorney
  • Akron, OH
Replied
@Jeremy Karja, you can buy right in the bad areas and do just fine. You just need to screen tenants effectively. The problem is that when you are in a bad area, you have a lower likelihood to receive an application from a good tenant. So, in order for the property to not be vacant, you may compromise and give it to a tenant that you would otherwise not be interacting with in a better neighborhood. So, you may likely get a bad tenant and they may destroy your entire profit margin by causing you to evict them, and despite an eviction, they may be judgment proof. So, if you have a leveraged property with a tenant not paying rent, you are essentially going to be eating the PIMI. It's like a double-whammy. It comes down to screening and familiarity with lower class tenants. On top of that, the chance that the tenant destroys your place and kills your profit margin is increased. When dealing with bad neighborhoods, I prefer to look at smaller properties. Not only do smaller properties provide for less capital expenditures, but they provide less squarefootage that a tenant can obliterate. So, in short, you want to screen tenants effectively, inspect the property frequently, keep an open channel of communication with the tenant, have a good lease agreement, provide your tenant with access to different welfare programs that reduce their likelihood of defaulting on your lease (e.g. LIHEAP), buy a smaller property, and use durable features.

Loading replies...