Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

76
Posts
50
Votes
Eduardo Zepeda
  • Real Estate Broker
  • San Francisco, CA
50
Votes |
76
Posts

How much should I tell them

Eduardo Zepeda
  • Real Estate Broker
  • San Francisco, CA
Posted

Hi BP community,

I'm hoping I might be able to get some feedback and clarity on a situation I'm providing help and moral support on. During the last cycle, circa 2004, a close and dear family member purchased a single family home in Sacramento, CA. As we all know, that market got hammered during the crash, but they were able to hang on to the property, even in a negative cash flow state for many years. Here we are in 2018, approaching or at the top of another cycle, and they still own the house and would now like to sell in hopes of finally making a small return. The home values in that area, though, have not really surpassed their previous highs. Here's a summary of the economics.

They purchased the property for $280,000 in 2004.

The loan balance is about $178k.

Monthly principal and interest payment is about $1,265 with $709 currently going to interest

Property taxes are $4,116 annually and insurance is $1,000.

Currently the house is vacant for the sale so there's no rental income.

Therefore, the monthly burn is -$1,135 (ouch).

For the sale:

Property was originally listed at $335k and they received 0 offers at that price. They've dropped the price twice since then and it's currently at $318k. It's been on the market for 66 days as of the date of this post. They've received one offer from what I deduced to be from a wholesaler for $275k. My advice to them at the time was that they should counter slightly higher and sell it for what they could and just get out. They passed.

Here's the thing. Just like many others, they're fixated on getting a price that to them makes sense based on what they paid for it. They say that once they pay commissions and closing costs, they don't want to accept a price in which they'll "lose" (chuckles slightly). I've explained to them that it doesn't matter what they think it's worth or what Zillow says it's worth. The market will tell you what it's worth. I took a look at the inventory in the area, and there are a lot of other homes for sale in the same area around the same price or lower. Many are more updated, and those seem to be the ones that move. There are many stale listings in the area, also, many of which have been on the market for over a month. It's just not a "hot" submarket in Sacramento.

My advice to them has wholeheartedly been to take whatever price you can get and get the heck out while they can. The opportunity of renovating the home just wouldn't pencil. It would take probably $50k-80k to get the home to a condition that it may sell in the high $300's - maybe - not at all worth that high of risk in my opinion. The market rent for this 3 bd 2 ba house with the level of finishes in this area is ~$1,500 if they were to keep the house and rent it. This would leave them in a break even at best once you factor in other operating expenses.

What do you think? Do you agree with me that they should sell at essentially any "reasonable" price? If so, what information would you give them to make them see things for the business reality of the situation, which is that they're realizing an economic loss every month they continue owning the house? Or, is there some other exit or possibility that I'm not thinking of, like maybe a lease option? Truthfully, I'd just hate to see them in which market conditions change, which they may in the near future, and they're stuck with this bad investment losing money that they then couldn't exit all over again. I look forward to hearing your thoughts and feedback!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

6,015
Posts
5,055
Votes
John Warren
  • Real Estate Broker
  • 3412 S. Harlem Avenue Riverside, IL 60546
5,055
Votes |
6,015
Posts
John Warren
  • Real Estate Broker
  • 3412 S. Harlem Avenue Riverside, IL 60546
Replied

@Eduardo Zepeda you are doing the right thing by advising them to exit the home. The home was a bad investment, and the sooner they can recoup part of their capital the sooner they can re-deploy the capital in a way that is profitable. If you show them how much their "burn" is every month and explain how much better they could do investing the proceeds it may help. 

I have been running into the same types of issues on listing appointments in my local market. People in Chicagoland have been desperately holding onto some of their properties they over paid for, and now that the market is higher they are trying to get out. They still don't understand why their house isn't worth what they paid for it, while we as investors think the market is over heated!

  • John Warren
  • Loading replies...