Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

2
Posts
0
Votes
John Smith
0
Votes |
2
Posts

Sub2 Mortgage but Parents Stay in House

John Smith
Posted

Quick scenario: parents have about 20k left on their mortgage, paying over the next 5 years. Low income, barely break even cash flow. The house is in dire need of repairs. They don't really want to move, and we'd like to keep this house in the family.

Can I buy their house for the exact remaining balance of the mortgage using a "subject to" sale AND they remain in the property? I live out of state, I would not reside in this house as a primary residence, and would not be charging them rent. My goal is to free up their cash flow each month that they could put towards repairs.

My first concern is: is this legal? My parents get to stay in a house while I pay their mortgage, I get the deed and an asset for 20% of the market value - "arms length" red flags come to mind here. Are we crossing a line here with the fact that they'll still be occupying the property? Since I'm not applying for any sort of traditional mortgage, investment or otherwise, do any of the qualifications (credit score, debt/income ratio, it not being my primary residence) come into play here?

To me, there has to be a catch. I'm basically getting a $100k house for $20k? What are the tax implications for me or my parents?

I'm aware of the risk of the bank calling the loan.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

972
Posts
958
Votes
Doug Pretorius
  • Investor
  • Kitchener-Waterloo, Ontario
958
Votes |
972
Posts
Doug Pretorius
  • Investor
  • Kitchener-Waterloo, Ontario
Replied

@John Smith No problem at all. You're basically describing what's called a Sale-Leaseback (if you want to do more research on it) except you're not going to charge your parents any rent.

There shouldn't be any tax implications for your parents since they're not making anything on the sale. Presumably you will have to pay capital gains if you ever sell it.

With that much equity you also won't have a problem if the bank ever decides to call the loan. If you have a job you should easily be able to refinance, or get a HELOC on your primary residence and pay it off.

Credit and DTI have nothing do to with sub2's. That's the whole point, the loan stays in your parent's names.

Loading replies...