Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 6 years ago,

User Stats

301
Posts
148
Votes
Mike Nelson
  • Investor
  • Oak Park, IL
148
Votes |
301
Posts

Asbestos, but limited to joint compound

Mike Nelson
  • Investor
  • Oak Park, IL
Posted

There is a multi-unit building on the market built in 1969.  The building has been tested for asbestos, and it was found to exist in the joint compound, not in the drywall itself.    My understanding is the asbestos particles could possibly be released if, say a nail was pounded into he wall to hang a picture, or someone cuts into the wall.  Does this present any kind of health hazard or potential legal problem?  Is the perception of this type of hazard worse than the reality?  Another question is, "was asbestos commonly used in construction during this time"?

Loading replies...