Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 14 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

950
Posts
337
Votes
Tod R.
  • Investor
  • Southlake, TX
337
Votes |
950
Posts

Obama proposes panel to sell off unneeded government real estate

Tod R.
  • Investor
  • Southlake, TX
Posted

Does this get anyone excited?

14,000 buildings and "structures". Any chance that these buildings won't need updating? It will be interesting to see how this unfolds. I wonder if they will include any land in the sell off

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

782
Posts
415
Votes
Darryl Dahlen
  • Commercial Loan Officer
  • Southern Maine, ME
415
Votes |
782
Posts
Darryl Dahlen
  • Commercial Loan Officer
  • Southern Maine, ME
Replied

This could be a great idea if properly handled. My first reaction is the government would be far better off outsourcing this to a company is already setup to handle these sorts of transactions from A-Z.

CBRE comes to mind for properties suited for commercial use and an entity like Caldwell Banker for residential. Using a company with a national presence is ideal for obvious reasons and having companies with the knowledge, experience, and staff to evaluate, market, and sell properties is a win-win.

Left in the hands of the government this could right into the crapper for far too many reasons. Just think of all the 6 figure jobs that would be created to sell off properties for pennies on the dollar, lol.

My biggest fear would be a foreign country (China comes to mind) coming in and buying up large parcels of property. While that may not necessarily be a bad thing, I'm of the mind to give American people first crack at this sort of thing since taxpayer money was used to build/develop these properties.

Still, this could be an exciting opportunity if done right.

Loading replies...