Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 14 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

950
Posts
337
Votes
Tod R.
  • Investor
  • Southlake, TX
337
Votes |
950
Posts

Obama proposes panel to sell off unneeded government real estate

Tod R.
  • Investor
  • Southlake, TX
Posted

Does this get anyone excited?

14,000 buildings and "structures". Any chance that these buildings won't need updating? It will be interesting to see how this unfolds. I wonder if they will include any land in the sell off

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

782
Posts
415
Votes
Darryl Dahlen
  • Commercial Loan Officer
  • Southern Maine, ME
415
Votes |
782
Posts
Darryl Dahlen
  • Commercial Loan Officer
  • Southern Maine, ME
Replied

This could be a great idea if properly handled. My first reaction is the government would be far better off outsourcing this to a company is already setup to handle these sorts of transactions from A-Z.

CBRE comes to mind for properties suited for commercial use and an entity like Caldwell Banker for residential. Using a company with a national presence is ideal for obvious reasons and having companies with the knowledge, experience, and staff to evaluate, market, and sell properties is a win-win.

Left in the hands of the government this could right into the crapper for far too many reasons. Just think of all the 6 figure jobs that would be created to sell off properties for pennies on the dollar, lol.

My biggest fear would be a foreign country (China comes to mind) coming in and buying up large parcels of property. While that may not necessarily be a bad thing, I'm of the mind to give American people first crack at this sort of thing since taxpayer money was used to build/develop these properties.

Still, this could be an exciting opportunity if done right.

Loading replies...