Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 14 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

2,615
Posts
2,993
Votes
Scott E.
  • Contractor
  • Scottsdale, AZ
2,993
Votes |
2,615
Posts

When looking for an invenstment property, do you consider location?

Scott E.
  • Contractor
  • Scottsdale, AZ
Posted

Ok, I know the thread title seems like a no brainer, but allow me to elaborate.

I am following REOs closely and trying to zone in on exactly where I would like to make a purchase for my first invenstment property. Naturally, all of the most affordable properties are popping up in what most would consider a "spotty" or "ghetto" neighborhood.

I know the old wisdom of "location, location, location" when it comes to real estate, but does this also apply when it comes to investments? The issue is that I simply cannot afford buying investment properties in the best areas of Phx. (i.e. Biltmore, Scottsdale, Fountain Hills, Ocotillo, Tempe etc) On top of them being out of my budget in those neighborhoods, the 50% rule seems much more difficult to apply to a $250k+ property, as opposed to a $30-$40k property. Plus, it's not like I will be living in said property anyway, so I don't have to deal with the day-to-day living in that particular area.

What are your guys thoughts and strategies on location when it comes to buying a buy-and-hold rental? Are "bad" areas ok, or would you avoid them? If the recomendation is to avoid them, then is Phx possibly not the best area to buy rentals?

Thanks!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,906
Posts
1,396
Votes
Mitch Kronowit
  • SFR Investor
  • Orange County, CA
1,396
Votes |
1,906
Posts
Mitch Kronowit
  • SFR Investor
  • Orange County, CA
Replied
Originally posted by Scott Swink:
Plus, it's not like I will be living in said property anyway, so I don't have to deal with the day-to-day living in that particular area.

No, but you'll be dealing with the tenants, their family and friends, and the neighbors that live in that area. Some landlords have good luck buying in the "slums" and collecting their rents in cash while carrying a gun. Sorry, not my cup of tea.

Of course, the numbers "work" better in lower-class neighbor "hoods" because the housing prices are so low (they're low for a reason), but those areas will never appreciate in value (unless there's some government sponsored urban renewal of sorts) and, IMHO, you'll be working your a$$ off for the next 30 years trying to earn that $100/door.

But I guess somebody has to provide housing to the underworld, it just won't be me. I prefer rentals in middle working-class neighborhoods where the cash flow may not be so hot, but the appreciation in the long-run will dwarf whatever monthly scratch I'm receiving from the rent.

Loading replies...