Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 7 years ago on .

User Stats

13
Posts
3
Votes
Aloma Murray
  • Eugene, OR
3
Votes |
13
Posts

Trading houses? Similar value but big difference in what's owed.

Aloma Murray
  • Eugene, OR
Posted

We are exploring some options currently and I wanted to put this out there to see if any of you have any insight.

We are interested in trading houses with someone who's house is probably similar in appraised value. She owes very little on her mortgage as she's lived there for 30 years.

Our house value according to Zillow (since we haven't had appraisals done yet): $620k built 2000, does not need any major work. We owe $349k

Her house value according to Zillow (since we haven't had appraisals done yet): $754k needs major work (we are ok with the work, it comes with the land we want as well and that has huge value to us) She owes around 60k (I think)

My question is more about how to go about the legal piece of this.

What are some options to make sure both parties are covered legally?

Are there any major reasons not to do this?