Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

675
Posts
792
Votes
Dave Stokley
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Cleveland, OH
792
Votes |
675
Posts

Electronic vs. paper offers for bank-owned

Dave Stokley
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Cleveland, OH
Posted

I have an agent that I like but he does not do electronic contracts. This is wildly frustrating and inconvenient, and I think it puts me at a competitive disadvantage - let alone that it wastes a lot of my time.

I am making an offer on a bank-owned property and asked him about doing an electronic contract. He says that banks prefer to see original signatures.

Is this true? It sounds like BS to me. In most situations these days legal documents don't need to be original signatures. I feel like this is just his excuse for not having e-contracts.

Cheers,

Dave

  • Dave Stokley
  • Loading replies...