Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 6 years ago on .

User Stats

5
Posts
0
Votes
Kevin Tran
  • Investor
  • Windermere FLorida
0
Votes |
5
Posts

Is it wise to set up 1-year reserve at time of purchase?

Kevin Tran
  • Investor
  • Windermere FLorida
Posted

For the market I'm evaluating for investment opportunities (northern california, san francisco bay area), none of the small multifamily properties I analyzed have positive cash flow after taking out PITI & 5% reserves (5% maintenance+ 5% vacancy+ 5% capex). However, if I reduce all the reserves to $0, then I get about $500 cash flow.

So, my question is, would it be wise to act as my own banker, per se, and put a year worth of all reserves upon the purchase of the property.  This way, each month I don't need to set aside money for reserve, and I can then count the "would be" reserve money as part of my profit?

Thanks for your advice.