Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

250
Posts
181
Votes
James G.
  • Investor
  • St Louis, MO
181
Votes |
250
Posts

Purchase the LLC rather than the Real Estate?

James G.
  • Investor
  • St Louis, MO
Posted
Hi BP. I’ve been in contact with a new lender who is telling me that there is a strategy that he uses where he buys out the company, rather than the real estate itself.. he says this way, the lender can give me a loan based on the appraised value rather than the purchase price. Also he says we can treat the transaction as a refinance this way rather than a purchase.. he says this can be very beneficial for me if the seller agrees, and that there can be tax benefits . Has anyone ever heard of this? Is this a legitimate strategy?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

20
Posts
13
Votes
ROB GRIFFIN
  • Fallston, MD
13
Votes |
20
Posts
ROB GRIFFIN
  • Fallston, MD
Replied

That is a legitimate strategy, but there are definitely some negatives to this strategy.  It can make it easier to finance or refinance, but you are now accepting any and all baggage that come with the company.  There may or may not be some issues lurking out there that happened under the prior owner that you will now be responsible for.  I would be more inclined to use this strategy if the property the company owns is commercial.  In any case, if you move forward get the seller to indemnify you against any claims that were from the time period in which he owned the property. 

Loading replies...