Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 7 years ago,

User Stats

16
Posts
1
Votes
Mark Hill
  • San Jose, CA
1
Votes |
16
Posts

Investment Location Rent vs. Own

Mark Hill
  • San Jose, CA
Posted

Hi, first time here and just getting started in rental property investing. I'm looking to target my old hometown in Massachusetts (I live in CA now) as my rental investment location. However, the renters percentage is 18% (vs. 82% own). Should I consider this a deterrent for this location? Additionally, I don't see many SFR properties available for rent today. Again, should this be considered a good or bad thing? Higher demand?

Appreciate your thoughts. 

Loading replies...