Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

20
Posts
4
Votes
David Seale
  • Houston, TX
4
Votes |
20
Posts

Using Seller's Title Company Because They "Already Opened Title"

David Seale
  • Houston, TX
Posted

Newbie investor here and am uneducated on the choices I have for a situation I'm in.

I've always heard that the title company of choice used in a real estate transaction should be up to the buyer and that the buyer should shop/select a company based on their tenure/value/reliability/etc. 

My fiancé and I have just finished negotiating terms on the contract and are in the process of signing on a property. We requested to use a title company that we've worked with in the past for this transaction. The agent at first agrees and fills out the contract with our requested company. However, she then comes back and says the seller "already opened title" with another company. Without knowing exactly what opening title encapsulates, I can guess that seller has essentially started processing the paperwork and such with the other company. Maybe even paid a fee. BTW the name of the company is http://onenationtitle.com.

My question is, what is the best way to navigate this snag? Should we not even worry about it? Should we negotiate to lower the purchase price to reflect the cost the seller might have incurred?

Thanks!

  • David Seale
  • Most Popular Reply

    User Stats

    9,934
    Posts
    10,788
    Votes
    Chris Mason
    • Lender
    • California
    10,788
    Votes |
    9,934
    Posts
    Chris Mason
    • Lender
    • California
    ModeratorReplied

    It's not unusual, in my area at least & this may be a "hot market" thing, for the listing agent to pick the title/escrow company (the generic catch-all term that covers all states/regions is "settlement service providers"). 

    Typically this means the title company has already reviewed the chain of title, etc, and has...

    - Tentatively approved title insurance for the buyer that comes along. 

    - Qualified the seller. Ensured that there aren't a bunch of liens, etc, that exceed the anticipated sales price.

    There are certainly cases where one place WILL issue title insurance, whereas another one will NOT issue title insurance, for the exact same property, with the exact same paperwork in-hand.

    If you switch to a new title company, that's not unlike a buyer switching their lender. If the company you pick will not insure title, it can be a bunch of hassle and whatnot for no reason. The policy itself, and what it protects you the buyer against, is standard. 

  • Chris Mason
  • Loading replies...