Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago,

User Stats

7
Posts
0
Votes
Justin H.
  • San Diego, CA
0
Votes |
7
Posts

If 1% of properties are good deals, who is buying the other 99%?

Justin H.
  • San Diego, CA
Posted

I've read repeatedly that it takes a lot of searching to find a great deal, or even a workable deal. If that's the case, who is buying all these other properties?

I know there are plenty of bad/failing landlords, but by definition they're going to be in the game for less time and own a lot less property than successful owners, so I don't see how they could make up a majority of deals.

Is it simply that the industry is lucrative enough that even people making bad deals can still stay afloat? Is the recent surge in housing prices over the last couple of decades contributing to this?

Loading replies...