Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

174
Posts
69
Votes
Peter K.
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Raleigh, NC
69
Votes |
174
Posts

Seller trying to use tactics on me? What do you think?

Peter K.
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Raleigh, NC
Posted

So I placed an offer on a SFR, the listing agent told me through my agent that "The seller has received a second offer on this home and is requesting a 'highest and best' offer from the buyers by 5:00pm tomorrow" . Honestly, I think this is a b.s. tactic where they are trying to engage me into a bidding war (without for sure knowing if there is even "another buyer"(?)"). I'm not emotionally attached and am willing to walk away from this deal at any moment. But I wanted the BP community to share your insights? I know I heard on one of the podcasts (where at an auction- they have a reserve price- and they have their people place bids to get it up to that price so they can encourage other people to bid higher), so I think this applies to the exact same situation. What do you think?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

3,412
Posts
4,013
Votes
Charlie MacPherson
  • China, ME
4,013
Votes |
3,412
Posts
Charlie MacPherson
  • China, ME
Replied

@Peter K. It could be BS, but it would be unethical.  When I represent a seller, I have a fiduciary relationship with him.  I'm required by ethics and law to get him the best deal possible - but I cannot lie to do it.

That said, I'm in the process of selling a property in the Boston area for another BP'er.  It's in a super hot market.

It's actual value is $400K, so we listed it at $375K in order to generate a bidding war.  We held off showings until the one and only open house on Sunday and requested final and best by 6:00 PM on Monday.

The open house was wild, with over 50 people coming through.  We had 7 offers.

The high bidder contacted me to ask how they could improve their offer.  

We ended up at $434.6K and the buyer (at my suggestion) dropped the home inspection contingency. :-)

So yes, especially in a hot market, final & best is a legit tactic - but there is another option.

Submit your highest & best, even if it's the same number, but include an escalation clause:

"Buyer will increase his offer to exceed any bonafide, good faith offer by $1,000 to a maximum price of $XXX,XXX.  The competitive offer must be presented for verification."

That should smoke out any BS.  If the agent or seller were to create a fake offer, they would have crossed the line into actual fraud.

Loading replies...