Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

174
Posts
69
Votes
Peter K.
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Raleigh, NC
69
Votes |
174
Posts

Seller trying to use tactics on me? What do you think?

Peter K.
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Raleigh, NC
Posted

So I placed an offer on a SFR, the listing agent told me through my agent that "The seller has received a second offer on this home and is requesting a 'highest and best' offer from the buyers by 5:00pm tomorrow" . Honestly, I think this is a b.s. tactic where they are trying to engage me into a bidding war (without for sure knowing if there is even "another buyer"(?)"). I'm not emotionally attached and am willing to walk away from this deal at any moment. But I wanted the BP community to share your insights? I know I heard on one of the podcasts (where at an auction- they have a reserve price- and they have their people place bids to get it up to that price so they can encourage other people to bid higher), so I think this applies to the exact same situation. What do you think?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

3,417
Posts
4,015
Votes
Charlie MacPherson
  • China, ME
4,015
Votes |
3,417
Posts
Charlie MacPherson
  • China, ME
Replied

@Peter K. It could be BS, but it would be unethical.  When I represent a seller, I have a fiduciary relationship with him.  I'm required by ethics and law to get him the best deal possible - but I cannot lie to do it.

That said, I'm in the process of selling a property in the Boston area for another BP'er.  It's in a super hot market.

It's actual value is $400K, so we listed it at $375K in order to generate a bidding war.  We held off showings until the one and only open house on Sunday and requested final and best by 6:00 PM on Monday.

The open house was wild, with over 50 people coming through.  We had 7 offers.

The high bidder contacted me to ask how they could improve their offer.  

We ended up at $434.6K and the buyer (at my suggestion) dropped the home inspection contingency. :-)

So yes, especially in a hot market, final & best is a legit tactic - but there is another option.

Submit your highest & best, even if it's the same number, but include an escalation clause:

"Buyer will increase his offer to exceed any bonafide, good faith offer by $1,000 to a maximum price of $XXX,XXX.  The competitive offer must be presented for verification."

That should smoke out any BS.  If the agent or seller were to create a fake offer, they would have crossed the line into actual fraud.

Loading replies...