Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

8
Posts
1
Votes
Dan Richter
  • Tampa, FL
1
Votes |
8
Posts

Is a 30 year loan really the best loan for a rental property?

Dan Richter
  • Tampa, FL
Posted

It seems that the general consensus for a rental property loan would be a 30 year loan, and I used to agree. The idea is that you can use the cash flow to pay the loan if you want to, or use it for a higher returning investment. Again, I used to think that too. But in every simulation I run, the 15 year loan is giving me a higher net worth after 5 years than the 30 year loan. My goal is net worth, I don't care about cash flow. Can anyone prove that a 30 year loan would better meet my goal? Because I can't shake this idea:

Let's look at a $100,000 property with an $80k financed. Let's say it rents out for $1000 and has $500 per month in expenses (not including mortgage.) Let's also say that a 15 year loan is at 4%, and the 30 year loan is at 5%.

With a 30 year loan, you pay about $430 for the mortgage, so including expenses, you cash flow about $70 per month. Also, $96 of the principle is also paid off, so in total, in the first year, you make about $2000 on your $20,000 down payment, a 10% ROI. I'm not going to include appreciation.

With the 15 year loan, you pay $591 for the mortgage, so including expenses, you cash flow about -$91 per month. But this time, the principle is paid off $325 in the first month. In the first year you will make about $2900 on the $20,000, which is now a 14.5% ROI, significantly higher.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

17,455
Posts
30,143
Votes
Russell Brazil
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Washington, D.C.
30,143
Votes |
17,455
Posts
Russell Brazil
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Washington, D.C.
ModeratorReplied

You are using the assumption that you only need to pay the minimum loan payment on either product.  You can get a 30 year loan, and pay as much on it as you would if it were amortized as a 15 to create a similar 5 year net worth if you so choose.

The benefit to the 30 year loan over the 15 in this situation is flexibility.  Life happens.  Maybe you get hit by a car and are unable to work, suddenly that cash flow may seem more important than building your net worth.

business profile image
District Invest Group
5.0 stars
44 Reviews

Loading replies...