Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago,

User Stats

5
Posts
1
Votes
Caroline C.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Southern California
1
Votes |
5
Posts

What to sell when you have to sell something

Caroline C.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Southern California
Posted

Hi all, I have to raise enough money to fund a lawsuit. The lawsuit isn't a slam dunk, but if it works out, it would reverse a big loss caused by a forgery done by a real estate agent (who is no longer in real estate, thank goodness). Because it isn't a slam dunk, it's not the kind of thing a litigation lender would want to invest in, so I'm assuming I'm on my own. 

There are two properties I can consider parting with, and they're very different. I think they'd take about the same length of time to sell, so that's not a factor. 

One is a paid-for mobile home, nicely upgraded and maintained, on a big lot in a semi-rural area. My tenant pays the insurance and property tax and all the maintenance, so it's headache-free, but not very lucrative. My proceeds would be enough to meet my current needs. 

The other is a co-owned duplex in a slowly up-and-coming part of Los Angeles, the rare duplex mainly single-family dwellings. This one is also headache-free, because my co-owner handles all the expenses. I'd be giving up $240 more in steady monthly income, but I'd net about $40K more than I would with the mobile home. I might not need it for the lawsuit, but I could pay off a tiny loan on another property with it and eliminate a $400/month loan payment 6 years early. (Or, I might need it for the lawsuit.) 

The $40,000 difference in proceeds is working pretty hard for me in L.A., given that the property sends me $249 more per month than the semi-rural mobile home does. I'm inclined to sell the mobile home because of that. 

On the touchy-feely level, I like the duplex and the neighborhood, whereas I wouldn't be sorry if I never saw the mobile and the town it's in again. If I had to move into one of them, I'd choose the duplex in a heartbeat. (Almost anyone would.)

Is there anything else to consider?

Loading replies...