Buying & Selling Real Estate
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Short-Term & Vacation Rental Discussions
presented by
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
presented by
1031 Exchanges
presented by
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated over 7 years ago,
Analyzing a deal: Conventional vs FHA
Hi BP Members,
I have two loan routes I can go with : Conventional or FHA.
How many people have gone ahead and bought a property that cash flowed negative/break-even when analyzed using 50% rule under FHA terms (upfront & monthly PMI charges eat up a big chunk of expenses)? Did it turn out to be a good long term investment? In my calculations I assume all units are rented out, non-owner occupied.
But, I can also afford a conventional 20% down payment and some properties cash flow nicely (10-12% cash on cash ROI) when using 50% rule. Of course the downside is I'd have used most of my funds and could not take advantage to buy in the case of a future recession.
When presented with both options, which would you choose?