Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$39.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

User Stats

43
Posts
9
Votes
Paul OBryan
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
9
Votes |
43
Posts

Raw land - limited supply of good deals?

Paul OBryan
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
Posted

I just got turned onto raw land investing and am considering purchasing a program with either @Mark Podolsky or @Seth Williams, but I'm wondering about one thing. Although there might be a seemingly unlimited amount of raw land for purchase, there is a finite number of good deals, for example, on tax delinquent parcels. If there are already a bunch of hungry raw land investors using Podolsky and Williams strategies for finding good deals, won't those deals be going, going, gone soon enough? After all, there are only just over 3,000 counties in US, and I'm sure the raw land guys are scrubbing the data bases for those good deals. Thoughts?

Loading replies...