Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

53
Posts
14
Votes
Christina Kim
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
14
Votes |
53
Posts

Invest in one local (SoCal) property or Multiple out of state?

Christina Kim
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
Posted

My husband and I have only done one deal in the past year (out of state), and we want to crank things up and get more things happening. We've been able to save enough to do something in the Southern California market, but realize our buying power with the capital can get so much more elsewhere. 

We want property in Southern California so we can have hands-on experience with management and have more control over what we buy. However, we can get more doors elsewhere.

Writing this down makes it seem like a clear choice that getting more units would be the right choice, but would there be advantages in getting ONE deal in SoCal over multiple smaller deals out of state?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

3,286
Posts
3,788
Votes
Andrew Johnson
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Encinitas, CA
3,788
Votes |
3,286
Posts
Andrew Johnson
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Encinitas, CA
Replied

@Christina Kim I would say (and let's overgeneralize for the sake of fun) that your primary residence can be your California asset.  Most of the people buying in California and buying for appreciation.  Assuming you own your home you likely have a good chunk of capital invested.  And if you bought a few years ago you probably have had some equity appreciation as well.  I know your personal home isn't an asset but (like it or not) is has you in the California market.  And there's nothing (down the road) to stop you from renting out your current home (turning it into an asset) and buying another home.

Because of that, personally, I've gone into a cash-flow market myself.  It's my very amateur version of diversification.  There's also nothing to stop you finding ONE deal out of state that is a 5+ commercial property.  It's one PM to deal with, one mortgage to worry about, etc.  And you do get some diversification because of the number of units and it can probably "self-support" easier than individual properties can (portfolio may be different matter).  

Or maybe I could turn it all around and say: "Invest in California because in 30 years when you retire you'll still be locked into a low property tax cost because of Prop 13".

To end my rambling, this is from my perspective as a buy-and-hold investor.  If you're sending yellow letters and looking for flips, wholesale deals, etc. you can toss out my reply as irrelevant!

Loading replies...