Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

14
Posts
2
Votes
Travis Bodnar
  • Murrieta, CA
2
Votes |
14
Posts

Understanding and determining the market trends/climate/cycle

Travis Bodnar
  • Murrieta, CA
Posted

Podcast 19 really brought something to the front of my mind (sorry I know I just started listening to the podcasts).  Everyone always talks about the market trends or climate.  I have also heard about market cycles (are the terms correct - used interchangeably??).  From what I have read, much like the cycles of the stock market, the best time to invest/buy is to buy when the market is at the bottom (correct me if I am wrong).  As a math and data junkie, I don't like to always trust the "opinion" of someone else.  So... How does an investor determine the market trend/climate/cycle within a given area?  Within a given state?  What are the tools available?  What are mathematical indicators people look at and where can one find ACTUAL and CORRECT data to support this?  If there is a blog/forum entry or even a keyword to search please let me know.  Thanks and appreciate your time.  

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

26
Posts
29
Votes
Craig Haskell
  • Real Estate Professional
  • Phoenix, AZ
29
Votes |
26
Posts
Craig Haskell
  • Real Estate Professional
  • Phoenix, AZ
Replied

HI Travis:

Let me throw my 2 cents in.

Real estate goes in cycles as most people know. These cycles are driven by real estate and economic fundamentals. Each year when there is overbuilding of the supply of rental space without the demand to absorb that space (negative absorption), then the market nears a top. If the economy has grown so fast where stupid capital chases poor investment assets, the market is nearing a top. Capital drives cycles because it influences capitalism.

At this point in the cycle, the general real estate market is not overbuilt in most markets. In fact, there are many markets where you can still buy real estate below replacement cost.

Construction loans (capital) are the most risky loans to get, especially on the commercial real estate side. Most high end buildings are being built by the big players who are either the low risk borrows or use cash off their balance sheets to finance their deals.

The middle market players (the biggest pool) struggle because of lack of capital. This produces less new development of inventory (supply), keeping downward pressure on overbuilding. This is great for real estate. We grow slowly until capital can catch up to start the next big development phase in this cycle.

There is no real estate bubble. Having been through 4 real estate cycles, we are not even close to over inflated pricing. The last really hard hit real estate bottom I participated in was during the Savings and Loan crisis in the late 80's and early 90's where the Federal Government set up the RTC to liquidate thousands and thousands of real estate properties throughout the U.S.

For example in Phoenix at the top of the market in 1988 where many S&L's financed deals, they built 32,000 apartment units and they only rented 4,000 (negative absorption). The vacancy rate peaked at 20%+ in some local markets. In 1990, they built "zero" new units and rented 2,000 units (positive absorption), very modestly reducing the vacancy rate. Most cycles in Phoenix last 6 to 7 years. We got so beat up in real estate during this time period, and got so low, the market need over 14 years to go through this cycle.

Again, because the housing market got so beat up during the last cycle that started in late 2006, I expect the upturn to again last longer than normal.

In most markets, we are a few year away from starting the overbuilding process. This overbuilding with high asset prices, creates a top in the real estate cycle. I think we are in the middle innings of the real estate cycle game.

My comments are aimed at the general real estate market. Some local markets are farther along in their cycle while other markets are lagging.

Loading replies...