Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

545
Posts
250
Votes
Jameson Sullivan
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Tacoma, WA
250
Votes |
545
Posts

Buy what i can afford or wait?

Jameson Sullivan
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Tacoma, WA
Posted
I know this is going to ultimately come down to personal preference and risk tolerance but I'm curious what you all have to say. I'm refinancing my house and am hoping to pull out about 40 k. now, in my area in Tacoma wa there are definitely homes for under 200k and alot of them are in areas i see as high growth potential areas over the long term but currently are C- neighborhoods, if not worse. I could probably find something in a better area but it would require work and I wouldn't be able to afford that if I wasn't able to leverage the entire cost. There is definitely crime in the areas as in any downtown-ish area but murder and very violent crime have significantly decreased over the last 20 years. so here's my dilemma, rents would be great in those areas versus my mortgage and I think cashflow would be high. long term I see the area moving into a somewhat B- but getting better nonetheless but TODAY I would still have to deal with the kind of people that live in these neighborhoods and they're generally lower income, lower... let's say weaker moral compasses and such. so, should I get my name on a property this year and just navigate these things as I go? should I take the high cash flow and just use a PM? or should I hold out another year until I can afford something In a better area but which would also show less appreciation and less cash flow? All opinions or stories are helpful! I always try to add paragraph breaks but sometimes my phone doesn't do it so apologies for that. best regards, Jameson M Sullivan

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

3,286
Posts
3,788
Votes
Andrew Johnson
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Encinitas, CA
3,788
Votes |
3,286
Posts
Andrew Johnson
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Encinitas, CA
Replied

Jameson Sullivan Personally, I would take less cash-flow and find something that isn't in a C- area for a first deal. PMs are great but renters with a "weak moral compass" hurt your bottom line even if there's an insulating layer. I think most would agree that there's a financial reward of investing in an area that goes from C- to B-. But that comes with the risk of it going from C- to D. I would skew towards an increased risk/reward deal until I had a couple of deals that were more modest with "reward" (cash-flow) so that they could support the risk of a C- property in the portfolio.

Loading replies...