Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 8 years ago,

User Stats

45
Posts
43
Votes
Bill Henley
  • Investor
  • Berkeley, CA
43
Votes |
45
Posts

Advice on choosing among offers on a SFR

Bill Henley
  • Investor
  • Berkeley, CA
Posted

We are selling our family home in the SF Bay Area. We expect to receive multiple offers, maybe as much as $1 million. Choosing the highest offer is simple, but I want to avoid two things: (1) a buyer who can't qualify for financing, and (2) a buyer who gets a post-acceptance inspection report and uses it to nickel and dime us with repair costs. I know I'm basically asking BP to read the minds of people who are not yet known even to me. But I wonder if there are any red flags or other tips that would persuade a seller to reject the highest offer in favor of a lower one which promises a clean and easy close.

Loading replies...