Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 8 years ago, 02/16/2017

User Stats

19
Posts
1
Votes
Scott Parker
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Laurel, MS
1
Votes |
19
Posts

Life insurance requirements from lenders

Scott Parker
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Laurel, MS
Posted

Hello all, I have an investing question in regard to lenders requiring life insurance. I have apparently reached a threshold with my bank (a million dollars in loans) and they are requiring me to get a million in life insurance with the bank as beneficiary.  Is this standard or common practice? I thought my properties were collateral enough. My properties and financials are great, I have no vacancies, they all cash flow very well, and most appraise at 20-30 thousand more than I paid. It seems as if I am having to pay to do business with this bank besides the money they are making on the mortgages. If this is common practice, would it be unreasonable to ask them to pay some or all of the premium? It seems that the bank has mitigated all of its risk at no cost to them. 

Loading replies...