Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

36
Posts
3
Votes
Payton Gonzales
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Greater Seattle Area
3
Votes |
36
Posts

Implications of a property on top of another property...

Payton Gonzales
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Greater Seattle Area
Posted

Hello!  I'm interested in making an offer on an apartment on top of another building in San Francisco, CA.  The building is a two unit building, with the property I'm interested in being apartment, residing on top of a commercial building (which houses a daycare).  

My question is what would the implications of buying a property on top of another that I don't be?  Is this a terrible idea? 

A few of my concerns being:

1) You don't have control of how the building on the ground level is being taken care of...

2) I'm interested in making the roof of the apartment a deck... if it's structurally sound, would you be allowed to do this if you own the top unit?

3) Apartments are rent controlled in San Francisco.  Because this building is mixed use, the apartment is not rent controlled.  Would this change the status if I were to own only one unit (i.e. it would become rent controlled)?

There are a lot of questions here, that I'm sure would be followed up with questions to attempt answering this, just starting here as I'm not sure where else to go :)

Thanks in advance for any response! 

Loading replies...