Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

331
Posts
277
Votes
Erik Hitzelberger
  • Investor
  • Louisville, KY
277
Votes |
331
Posts

Provide guidance or Caveat Emptor?

Erik Hitzelberger
  • Investor
  • Louisville, KY
Posted

BP provides a platform for investors to share knowledge and to conduct deals.  Many (especially newer) investors often ask for help in evaluating deals.  My question is do you ever provide answers to the unasked questions?  Specifically, do you comment on posted deals that are not deals because of information that may not be obvious to the buyer?  Should we do so or is due diligence entirely up to the Buyer?  Here's a couple of examples..

1) The ARV and/or provided comps are significantly incorrect.

2) The property has a stigma that is publicly known, but isn't advertised.  (I recently saw a house posted in a neighborhood that had 5 murders in the last 6 months.  The Buyer had no idea how tough the area was). 

3) The property has non-conforming features that a buyer may not be aware of.  An example would be one or more "bedrooms" in a basement that could not be legally classified as bedrooms at resale. 

Everyone has different goals, rehab costs, standards for livability,etc.  So, I see no reason to get involved at that level.  But, are we obligated to help others properly evaluate risk or are we obligated to not interfere?   

  • Erik Hitzelberger
  • Most Popular Reply

    User Stats

    9,939
    Posts
    15,988
    Votes
    JD Martin
    • Rock Star Extraordinaire
    • Northeast, TN
    15,988
    Votes |
    9,939
    Posts
    JD Martin
    • Rock Star Extraordinaire
    • Northeast, TN
    ModeratorReplied

    As best as I can tell, what you are asking is if we do any legwork to help out the poster. I don't. I don't mind offering my opinion based on the numbers they throw out there, but if they don't know if the comps are right or if there's a landfill next door, I'm not going to the house or Google Earth to find out for them. If they already know stuff, and mention it, or provide pictures, I'm happy to comment on that stuff to the best of what they've put out there. 

    Caveat: if any of these people were direct competitors to me on deals in my area, I might be inclined to be less charitable! :D Part of successful REI involves combining luck, knowledge, resources, and instinct to obtain profitable properties, and I don't have any interest in helping people going after the same properties as me, nor in sharing what I know about the property.

    business profile image
    Skyline Properties

    Loading replies...