Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

5
Posts
1
Votes
Fred F.
  • Bakersfield, CA
1
Votes |
5
Posts

Using both self-directed IRA and solo 401k on same property

Fred F.
  • Bakersfield, CA
Posted

Hello BP Community,

Not a visit goes by where I don't learn something new. I recently completed a rehab on a SFR thru my LLC using a loan from a private lender for the purchase, and funded the remodel using a HELOC on my primary residence.

Since doing some reading here, it appears I can use better options in the future.

I have a question that I haven’t seen posted, so far.

  • Can funds from a self-directed IRA AND a solo 401k be used on the same property? i.e., purchase a property using the IRA and remodel using the solo 401k?

After leaving my last job, I set up a self-directed IRA and moved my old 401k to it.

I still have funds in that company’s defined benefits plan that I believe will be best used by moving to a Solo 401k (I understand the rule of being able to use a max of 50% or $50k, whichever is less.  Other than that, I’m still coming up to speed on the solo…much to learn).

Thanks in advance.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

5
Posts
1
Votes
Fred F.
  • Bakersfield, CA
1
Votes |
5
Posts
Fred F.
  • Bakersfield, CA
Replied

Brian,

Thanks for the info. Good to know my existing LLC can sponsor a Solo 401k. The single pool of self-directed funds with checkbook control seems to better fit in with my goals.

Justin,

Thanks for your response. As all of you have pointed out, not needing a new LLC for the Solo 401k is a huge takeaway. In past research, I was under the impression it was a requirement to do business with a new Solo 401k, or at least of some benefit. And there is that point about not having to pay the $800 fee for the privilege of starting up and owning an LLC here in CA.

All,

Thanks very much for clearing up the murky waters. Your responses really shortened the path to what I needed to know. My next step is to sit down with my CPA and ask him to back-fill into this discussion. Thanks, and prosperous investing to you.

Loading replies...