Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

139
Posts
53
Votes
Adam Juodis
  • Plainfield, IL
53
Votes |
139
Posts

What % of rent is a safe estimate for Vacancy/Capex/MGMT/repairs?

Adam Juodis
  • Plainfield, IL
Posted

I was wondering, when analyzing a potential property to purchase, what % of rents do you account for to be vacancy, capital expenditures, property management, and repairs? I am starting to practice analyzing deals and running the numbers, but I do not want to lowball my expenses, or overestimate either. I was wondering what others in the community do when it comes to estimating these costs. 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

393
Posts
995
Votes
Ben Zimmerman
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Raleigh, NC
995
Votes |
393
Posts
Ben Zimmerman
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Raleigh, NC
Replied

10% is fairly standard place to start for each category, but never trust any calculation based on a flat percentage.  I don't use percentages for anything, as there are too many variables which causes them to be wildly inaccurate.  Using the numbers quoted above, your average home in San Francisco which costs 1million, and rents for 3500+ would require 4200 in general repairs per year, and 4200 in cap ex, which is insanely high.  Likewise newer homes will generally have significantly less general maintenance than something built in the 1950's.  Investing in A/B neighborhoods tends to attract better tenants than in C areas which causes significantly less wear and tear as they tend on the whole to take better care of the property ect ect. 

Also, I tend to price my rentals slightly below the norm.  This keeps my vacancy rate virtually non existent, and my maintenance just as low.  If you estimate for 10% vacancy, that means on average your house sits empty 5 weeks out of the year, which is probably high but for the sake of argument we'll go with it.  If you're charging 1000/month, I can afford to charge as little as 900/month and we still come out even at the end of the year if I get a long term tenant.  If I charge 950, the tenants typically want to stay since it's still the cheapest place in the neighborhood and I generally speaking come out ahead financially, at the end of the year I can evaluate them and decide if I want to renew their lease or if they are a problem tenant I simply don't renew and can quickly find someone else.  This causes me to have essentially nothing but long term tenants that generally take very good care of the property.  Thus reducing not only my bills, but drastically reduces the amount of time I spend screening tenants, managing the property, and running around doing all the little things. 

Loading replies...