Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago,

User Stats

6
Posts
3
Votes
Mark Murray
  • Manhattan, KS
3
Votes |
6
Posts

House Hacking

Mark Murray
  • Manhattan, KS
Posted

Newbie to House Hacking here. Please shed some light into this scenario for me. I thought I had read as a married couple, only ONE person of the partnership has to actually "live" in one of the dwellings for a year.

I brought up this to a realtor recently, one that I have used in the past for non-investment property purchases. Becuase I was interested in a four-plex. I explained that the above scenario was something I would like to partake in; if at all possible. Meaning, either my partner or I alone can house hack this property.

The realtor stated, " You can only do that with single-family homes."

Any response would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks!

Loading replies...