Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

12
Posts
2
Votes
Paul Munly
  • Chico, CA
2
Votes |
12
Posts

Valuation: Which is more accurate - Insurance Co or RE Websites?

Paul Munly
  • Chico, CA
Posted

Ladies and Gents, I'm evaluating an east coast to west coast move, and am debating whether or not to sell my current residence (single family home) or to rent it (and while that's an entirely different discussion, but my current question factors into that discussion).  I've been looking at sites like Zillow, Redfin, and Trulia to get a ballpark value estimate for my property, and they tend to estimate its worth at between $310k to $330k, which I think is in the right ballpark based upon recent sales in the area.  Then I looked at my home-owners insurance company's estimate, which is totally throwing off my guesstimate -- they estimate its value at $350k.  I'm assuming that the insurance company is inflating the numbers a bit for a number of reasons (higher premiums for a start), but I have done some work to the property (new roof, new windows, new HVAC, encapsulated crawlspace) that I'd like to think increases the value a bit (and would make me much happier if I do sell!).  In general, which estimate is more accurate? 

Thanks!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

59
Posts
33
Votes
Trevor Kolb
  • Colorado Springs, CO
33
Votes |
59
Posts
Trevor Kolb
  • Colorado Springs, CO
Replied

@Paul Munly: Your insurance company uses a Replacement Cost Estimator to determine the value in which to insure your home. It's based on many factors including builder's materials and other typical costs with covering your property for rebuilding. Their estimate is NOT a valuation on your home, merely the estimate they associate with replacing your current home based on your homes current size and building materials. In truth, most companies will require the property to be insured for at least that value, some, like Esurance (the company I work for) will allow you to insure the home to 70% the RCE value. Though you would have to agree to select value coverage (Agreeing you knowingly wish to under insure your home based on the value provided). 

At least with my company, this is how it works. I cannot speak on behalf of others, but this is typical practice. You can tell them the amount of coverage you want, and the company will determine if they can meet your request. After that, it becomes your decision to insure with them or not. It's really not about getting the extra premium from you, but for them to determine a way to value your home based on the information provided. As an insurance agent, if I spent any more amount of time in actually determining your properties value, it would be a waste. This would only increase the premium's an insurance company would charge because we would have to require additional underwriting.

Loading replies...