Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

50
Posts
6
Votes
Zoe Mercier
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Tallahassee, FL
6
Votes |
50
Posts

Flip to build capital OR BRRR? Which is better?

Zoe Mercier
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Tallahassee, FL
Posted

@Brandon Turner about the BRRR strategy I wonder if we might be working too hard? Or maybe I'm not understanding it right, hence this post asking for feedback.

For example, if we were to buy several distressed properties to rehab and sell the plan is to then use the lump sums of cash we would (hopefully!) make to finance the down payments and closings on rentals with good cash flow.

BUT, why then wouldn't we save ourselves work and buy distressed properties and rehab them, then refinance them to get back what we put into them and then start renting them. The goal here would be to refinance only the amount we put in (enough to pay back any lenders and pay ourselves a small amount) to keep the mortgages low to increase the cash flow amount. This way we are only doing one rehab to begin getting the rental cash flow from a single property rather than doing several flips to make enough to not come out of pocket for the rental.

Hope my explanation makes sense. Based on that, is there something we are missing about either process that someone could enlighten me to? I was a special ed teacher for 10 years and my classroom motto was "work smarter, not harder" and something about our original strategy just seems to violate my code when I think about BRRR. Thanks for any clarification you can give :)

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

786
Posts
717
Votes
Ryland Taniguchi
  • San Francisco, CA
717
Votes |
786
Posts
Ryland Taniguchi
  • San Francisco, CA
Replied
Originally posted by @Lisa Misuraca:

Mostly the length of time needed to refi the brrrr. The interest on the hard money would eat up all his profits,And the concept is to then get enough money out of the refi to repeat.Not saying it can't be done it'll just be a longer road.Where as he could do very efficient flips with the hard money and get his own capital to work into the brrrr.

Why would the refinance on a BRRRR take longer than the flip listing and sale? I do both BRRRR and flips and it's faster to refinance than to list and close. In both BRRRR and flips, hard money costs eat up the profit substantially if the rehab is not completed quickly. It's the same amount of work. Why not get your downpayment money back and keep a rental?

Both Flips and BRRRR require capital. If the All-In Cost is at 70% LTV and surpasses the 1% rule, it would probably always be better to BRRRR than flip. You flip because you have 70% of ARV minus construction costs but the All-In Cost does not surpass the 1% rule.

I just raised $30 million and will be launching a combo loan that does the hard money and the BRRRR upfront in one loan. The take-out loan will be 70% LTV, asset-based, 6.5% 30-year fixed. One of the benefits of BRRRR versus flip. Accumulating assets with cash flow and 30% instant equity is the fast road to using this portfolio as collateral to securitize bigger money raises through a reg D rule 506(c) private placement.

Loading replies...